Skip to content
eCHR logo
  • Home
  • Resources
  • Resources on the Chisinau Declaration
  • Editors
  • How to Submit a Contribution
  • Contact
  • A Critical Look at the Implicit Messages in the CDDH Outcome Document with Elements for the Chișinău Declaration

    Wolfgang Benedek

    •

    April 16, 2026

    The outcome document ‘containing elements for a political declaration’ that the Steering Committee for Human Rights (CDDH) of the Council of Europe published on 20 March 2026 deserves a critical look. Thus, it can be established whether the CDDH managed to take…

    Continue reading →

  • The Chișinău Process: Dialogue or Duress?

    Alice Donald

    •

    April 14, 2026

    It has been a testing year for the European Court of Human Rights, from the letter of nine states in May 2025 to the Joint Statement of 27 to the Chișinău process that will culminate in a political declaration on migration on…

    Continue reading →

  • A Statement Built on Shaky Ground: Unveiling the Controversial Assumptions in the 27 Countries’ Statement

    Sharon Coen

    •

    April 10, 2026

    On December 10, 2025, twenty-seven countries delivered a joint statement to the Council of Europe’s conference of ministers of justice, calling for an “updated interpretation” of the European Convention on Human Rights in light of what the signatories identify as “today’s challenges.”…

    Continue reading →

  • Launch event: “Framing Human Rights: Authoritarianism, Migration, and Climate Change in the Council of Europe”

    Corina Heri

    •

    April 8, 2026

    On Monday, 4 May 2026, an online event on “Framing Human Rights: Authoritarianism, Migration, and Climate Change in the Council of Europe” will be held at the Hertie School’s Centre for Fundamental Rights. This event launches a recent special issue in the…

    Continue reading →

  • An Invitation to Interrogate the Longue Durée of European Human Rights and Its Exclusions

    Esra Demir-Gürsel

    •

    April 7, 2026

    10 December 2025, twenty-seven Council of Europe (CoE) member states delivered a joint statement. This statement has launched the so-called “Chișinău process,” which is expected to lead to the adoption of a political declaration on the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)…

    Continue reading →

  • The CDDH’s Chișinău Report, Article 3 and the ‘extra-territorial’ context

    Ed Bates

    •

    April 2, 2026

    The main focus of this post is on the extra‑territorial application of Article 3. I have some sympathy with the CDDH’s calls for caution in that specific area and wish to raise some broader, related issues. However, I feel compelled to frame…

    Continue reading →

  • Symposium on the Challenges of Chișinău

    Symposium on the Challenges of Chișinău

    Kushtrim Istrefi

    •

    April 1, 2026

    Since the adoption of the European Convention on Human Rights, the system has been recognized for its continuous and progressive evolution. Through slow but incremental change, over the past decades we have witnessed the adoption of new protocols that grant individuals access…

    Continue reading →

  • New Book on EU Fundamental Rights in ECtHR Case-Law

    New Book on EU Fundamental Rights in ECtHR Case-Law

    Antoine Buyse

    •

    March 17, 2026

    Victor David (KU Leuven) has published the book EU Fundamental Rights as a Special Source for the European Court of Human Rights. Doing the opposite of many studies in this field, it looks at the influence of EU fundamental rights law on…

    Continue reading →

  • New Podcast Episode ‘Lawyering Before the ECtHR’

    New Podcast Episode ‘Lawyering Before the ECtHR’

    Matilda Radoš

    •

    March 16, 2026

    The ‘Between Heat and Hope’ Podcast just released its new episode entitled ‘Lawyering Before the European Court of Human Rights‘. In the episode, Veronika Fikfak (University College London) shares her experience with human rights litigation before the ECtHR and the ‘European Human…

    Continue reading →

  • The ECHR’s Procrustean bed: A final call for perspective in the Chișinău process

    The ECHR’s Procrustean bed: A final call for perspective in the Chișinău process

    Alice Donald

    •

    March 10, 2026

    By Alice Donald and Andrew Forde In Greek mythology, Procrustes made visitors fit his bed by either stretching them or cutting off their legs. Sure, they would “fit” the bed, but at what cost? Applying an arbitrary approach to a complex problem…

    Continue reading →

Previous
1 2 3 4 5 6 … 152
Next

Search

Subscribe


Earlier posts

2026
  • October3
  • September2
  • August3
  • July3
  • June9
  • May7
  • April10
  • March5
  • February5
  • January8
2025
  • December9
  • November8
  • October12
  • September4
  • August1
  • July3
  • June8
  • May5
  • April7
  • March3
  • February7
  • January13
2024
  • December2
  • November6
  • October11
  • September5
  • August2
  • July1
  • June6
  • May6
  • April10
  • March4
  • February5
  • January6
2023
  • December7
  • November6
  • October8
  • September3
  • August1
  • July3
  • June9
  • May14
  • April6
  • March8
  • February9
  • January9
2022
  • December7
  • November8
  • October11
  • September7
  • August5
  • July1
  • June2
  • May7
  • April8
  • March13
  • February6
  • January4
2021
  • December5
  • November6
  • October3
  • September5
  • August3
  • July5
  • June14
  • May5
  • April12
  • March9
  • February6
  • January9
2020
  • December4
  • November11
  • October6
  • September11
  • August2
  • July2
  • June3
  • May6
  • April3
  • March4
  • February3
  • January5
2019
  • December3
  • November4
  • October3
  • September2
  • August3
  • July2
  • June6
  • May5
  • April6
  • March4
  • February2
2018
  • December2
  • November4
  • October6
  • September1
  • August3
  • July1
  • June2
  • May4
  • April6
  • March5
  • February6
  • January4
2017
  • December1
  • November4
  • October4
  • September4
  • August1
  • July1
  • June3
  • May4
  • April4
  • March3
  • February4
  • January3
2016
  • December1
  • November6
  • October8
  • September2
  • August2
  • July3
  • May2
  • April6
  • March4
  • February2
  • January5
2015
  • December5
  • November4
  • October8
  • September3
  • July1
  • June3
  • May2
  • April6
  • March2
  • February2
  • January1
2014
  • December4
  • November2
  • October4
  • September5
  • August9
  • July3
  • June2
  • May6
  • April7
  • March6
  • February9
  • January10
2013
  • December8
  • November10
  • October11
  • September7
  • August3
  • July10
  • June8
  • May7
  • April11
  • March13
  • February10
  • January9
2012
  • December8
  • November9
  • October14
  • September11
  • August6
  • July6
  • June14
  • May7
  • April14
  • March15
  • February13
  • January11
2011
  • December10
  • November11
  • October15
  • September11
  • August12
  • July10
  • June10
  • May10
  • April11
  • March20
  • February13
  • January12
2010
  • December12
  • November12
  • October11
  • September13
  • August13
  • July2
  • June18
  • May15
  • April12
  • March12
  • February16
  • January14
2009
  • December10
  • November15
  • October12
  • September7
  • August9
  • July7
  • June10
  • May8
  • April9
  • March13
  • February11
  • January15
2008
  • December9
  • November17
  • October21
  • September2
  • August1
  • July17
  • June22
  • May5
eCHR logo
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Editors
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Resources Directory
  • ECHR Links
  • Human Rights Journals
  • Human Rights Blogs
  • Human Rights Research
  • Other Relevant Blogs
  • ECHR MOOC
  • Resource on ECHR Future

© 2026 ECHR Blog. All rights reserved. The content provided does not constitute legal advice.

Supported by the Netherlands Network of Human Rights Research (NNHRR) and the Netherlands Institute of Human Rights (SIM)